Why Don’t My Patients Get Better?

Dentist sitting with patient at a desk with a checklist.
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

As healthcare providers, we often encounter situations where our patients don’t improve as expected, despite our best efforts and well-crafted treatment plans. This can be frustrating for both the patient and the practitioner. While it’s natural to question the appropriateness of the treatment plan or even the diagnosis, there’s another crucial factor we must consider, namely confounders to treatment success.

Understanding Confounders

Confounders are factors that can interfere with the effectiveness of a treatment plan, even when that plan is theoretically sound. These factors can significantly influence a patient’s response to treatment, sometimes overshadowing the potential benefits of the prescribed interventions. These can include:

• Depression and anxiety

• Poor adherence to the treatment plan

• Limited access to medical care

• Fear of medications

• Excessive somatic focus

• Stress levels

• Sleep quality

• Parafunctional habits (e.g., teeth grinding)

• Overall health status

• Pain severity and its impact on daily life

Like what you’re learning?  Download a brochure for our Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine certificate or master’s degree program.

The Danger of Overlooking Confounders

When we fail to systematically assess the presence of confounders, we risk misunderstanding why a patient isn’t improving. This can lead to a dangerous cycle of treatment escalation, potentially culminating in unnecessary invasive procedures. Consider the traditional treatment pyramid for chronic pain conditions, where surgical intervention often sits at the top. This model can be misleading and potentially harmful if we don’t account for confounders. In many cases, addressing psychological factors through behavioral therapy might be more appropriate and effective than escalating to surgery.

A Systematic Approach to Assessing Confounders:

To avoid the pitfalls of overlooking confounders, we need a structured approach to identifying and addressing these factors. One effective method is a two-step process:

• Step 1: Initial ScreeningUse a simple 0-10 numeric rating scale to quickly assess potential confounders during the initial visit. This allows for efficient identification of areas that may require further attention.

• Step 2: Detailed Follow-Up: For any factors rated above a certain threshold (e.g., 5 out of 10), administer more detailed, validated questionnaires at the next visit. This ensures a thorough investigation of significant issues without overwhelming patients with lengthy assessments during their first appointment. This approach is supported by research, including early work in orofacial pain by Oakley et al. (1993), which demonstrated that brief patient self-ratings of psychological factors have moderate to strong associations with extensive psychological testing.

The Role of Real-World Data

Collecting and analyzing real-world data on treatment outcomes and confounding factors can provide valuable insights into why some patients don’t improve as expected. Tools like patient-facing apps can help gather this information systematically, allowing for more personalized and effective treatment strategies.

Rethinking the Treatment Pyramid

Instead of a linear escalation towards invasive procedures, we should consider a more holistic approach that accounts for confounding factors. Only by systematically assessing and addressing confounders, we can develop more effective, personalized treatment plans that improve outcomes and avoid unnecessary escalation to invasive procedures.This might involve:

• Addressing psychological factors through behavioral therapy

• Improving sleep quality and stress management

• Enhancing treatment adherence through education and support

• Ensuring access to necessary healthcare resources

• Managing pain through multimodal approaches

Conclusion

When patients don’t improve as expected, it’s crucial to look beyond the treatment plan and diagnosis. By systematically assessing confounding factors, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of why a patient might not be responding to treatment. This approach allows us to tailor our interventions more effectively, potentially avoiding unnecessary procedures and improving overall patient outcomes. Remember, the path to improvement isn’t always a straight line upwards. Sometimes, the key to success lies in addressing the underlying factors that might be hindering progress. By taking a holistic, patient-centered approach that accounts for confounders, we can provide more effective care and help our patients achieve better health outcomes.

Earn an Online Postgraduate Degree in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine

Like what you’re learning? Consider enrolling in the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC’s online, competency-based certificate or master’s program in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine

The information and resources contained on this website are for informational purposes only and are not intended to assess, diagnose, or treat any medical and/or mental health disease or condition. The use of this website does not imply nor establish any type of provider-client relationship. Furthermore, the information obtained from this site should not be considered a substitute for a thorough medical and/or mental health evaluation by an appropriately credentialed and licensed professional. Commercial supporters are not involved in the content development or editorial process.

Authors

Share This

Share this post with your friends!